Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 53
Filter
1.
medrxiv; 2023.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2023.09.21.23295905

ABSTRACT

ObjectiveBeginning in October 2021 in the US and elsewhere, cases of severe pediatric hepatitis of unknown etiology were identified in young children. While the adenovirus and adenovirus-associated virus have emerged as leading etiologic suspects, we attempted to investigate a potential role for SARS-CoV-2 in the development of subsequent liver abnormalities. DesignWe conducted a study utilizing retrospective cohorts of de-identified, aggregated data from the electronic health records of over 100 million patients contributed by US health care organizations. ResultsCompared to propensity-score-matched children with other respiratory infections, children aged 1-10 years with COVID-19 had a higher risk of elevated transaminases (Hazard ratio (HR) (95% Confidence interval (CI)) 2.16 (1.74-2.69)) or total bilirubin (HR (CI) 3.02 (1.91-4.78)), or new diagnoses of liver diseases (HR (CI) 1.67 (1.21-2.30)) from one to six months after infection. Patients with pre-existing liver abnormalities, liver abnormalities surrounding acute infection, younger age (1-4 years), or illness requiring hospitalization all had similarly elevated risk. Children who developed liver abnormalities following COVID-19 had more pre-existing conditions than those who developed abnormalities following other infections. ConclusionThese results indicate that SARS-CoV-2 may prime the patient for subsequent development of liver infections or non-infectious liver diseases. While rare ([~]1 in 1,000), SARS-CoV-2 is a risk for subsequent abnormalities in liver function or the diagnosis of diseases of the liver. What is already known on this topicClusters of severe hepatitis in children in 2022 coincident with the increase in COVID-19 infections in children raised the question of the contribution of SARS-CoV-2 to the hepatitis outbreak, though it was soon determined that SARS-CoV-2 was not the primary etiologic agent. What this study addsSARS-CoV-2 may prime the patient for subsequent development of liver infections or non-infectious liver diseases. How this study might affect research, practice or policyDespite the mild initial disease in children, there may be longer term consequences of COVID-19, such as liver abnormalities, that warrants further investigation.


Subject(s)
Acute Disease , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury , Liver Failure , Respiratory Tract Infections , COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Abnormalities , Liver Diseases
2.
researchsquare; 2023.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-3129409.v1

ABSTRACT

Background Ischemia occurs when blood supply to tissues is limited, resulting in cellular dysfunction and necrosis. Reperfusion, or the process of restoring blood flow, can result in an overabundance of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and toxic byproducts. The I/R (Ischemia / Reperfusion) technique used in liver resection and transplantation has been linked to liver damage. Molnupiravir, a non-hepatotoxic oral medicine, is converted into N-hydroxycytidine (NHC). The purpose of this study is to see how molnupiravir affects I/R-induced damage of liver in rats.Methods We divided the rats into three groups: Sham operation (SG) (n = 6), Liver I/R (LIR) (n = 6), and Molnupiravir + Liver I/R (MIR) (n = 6) groups. The MIR group (n = 6) received 40 mg/kg of molnupiravir. All animals were subjected to laparotomy, hepatic ischemia (1 hour), and reperfusion (6 hours). At the end of the trial, liver tissue samples were tested for IL-1β, tGSH, NF-κB, MDA, and TNF-α levels, as well as histopathological examination. The levels of ALT and AST in the blood were determined. The MIR group's results were in comparison to the SG and LIR groups.Results Biochemical examination revealed that NF-ƘB, MDA, TNF-α, IL-1β, ALT, and AST measurements were higher in the LIR and MIR groups than in the SG group. The SG group had the highest tGSH values. Histopathological examinations revealed that the MIR group had the most damage.Conclusion While molnupiravir, which is included in COVID-19 treatment regimen since it has no projected liver toxicity, does not affect healthy liver tissue, it does exacerbate ischemia/reperfusion injury in stressed liver tissue. Molnupiravir should be used with caution because it has the potential to aggravate liver damage during procedures such as liver transplantation or resection.


Subject(s)
Necrosis , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury , Ischemia , Liver Failure , COVID-19
3.
ssrn; 2023.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-SSRN | ID: ppzbmed-10.2139.ssrn.4455379

ABSTRACT

Probably one of the biggest global challenges is viral epidemics, nowadays. The COVID-19 crisis proved that the more foresight we have to find effective compounds in various aspects, the better we can deal with viral epidemics. Different types of viruses directly or indirectly affect liver function. Therefore, an important aspect of combating viral infections is protecting the liver as a vital human organ.Natural compounds as a rich source of potential hepatoprotective drugs have been interested. Several in vitro and in vivo researches have been conducted to investigate the effectiveness of phytochemicals and vitamins on liver failure caused by a viral infection, but few of these compounds have been studied in the clinical phase, and most of them have had acceptable effectiveness. In this review, we focused on the findings of clinical studies that have addressed the role of phytochemicals and vitamins in reversing liver dysfunction associated with viral infections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Liver Failure , Virus Diseases , Liver Diseases
4.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 20(11): 1009-1015, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2312284

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Wilson disease is an inherited disorder that results in copper accumulation in the tissues with liver injury and failure. Orthotopic liver transplant is one of the treatments of choice for this disease. The aim of this study was to compare the neurological symptoms, before and after orthotopic livertransplant, of patients with liver cirrhosis due to Wilson disease, who represent a special group of patients with liver failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2007 and 2020, there were 24 patients with Wilson disease resistant to medical treatment who underwent deceased donor orthotopic livertransplant and were followed up for 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years for evaluation with neurological scoring systems. Patients were also evaluated for postoperative complications and survival. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients evaluated, there were 13 (54.2%) female patients and 11 (45.8%) male patients, and the mean age was 34 years (range, 14-57 years). One of the patients died from early postoperative sepsis. After orthotopic livertransplant, disease scores returned to normal in 16 patients and improved in the remaining patients. Before transplant, all patients required help in their daily activities. After transplant, there were significant improvements in some symptoms, and the patients became more independent in their daily lives. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that orthotopic liver transplant provides significant improvement in neurological symptoms and quality of life in patients with Wilson disease.


Subject(s)
Hepatolenticular Degeneration , Liver Failure , Liver Transplantation , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Hepatolenticular Degeneration/complications , Hepatolenticular Degeneration/diagnosis , Hepatolenticular Degeneration/surgery , Liver Transplantation/methods , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Liver Failure/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies
5.
preprints.org; 2023.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-PREPRINTS.ORG | ID: ppzbmed-10.20944.preprints202305.1298.v1

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Co-morbidities such as hypertension and cardiovascular disease are major risk factors for severe COVID-19. The renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) is critically involved in their pathophysiology and is counterbalanced by both angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), the functional receptor of SARS-CoV-2, and the kallikrein-kinin-system (KKS). Considerable research interest with respect to COVID-19 treatment is, thus, currently directed towards the components of these systems. In an earlier study, we noticed significantly reduced carboxypeptidase N (CPN, KKS member) activity and partially excessive angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE, RAS member) activity in the sera of both hospitalized (HoP) COVID-19 patients and a sub-group of covalescent patients, while in the majority of the probands recovering from the disease these values had returned to normal. The data had been obtained using bradykinin (BK) as a reporter peptide, which is a target of both CPN and ACE, and they were supplemented by serum proteomics of the same patient cohort. We hypothesized that the data could be indicative of Long COVID, which had not been fully appreciated at the time of our study.; (2) Methods: The data were re-evaluated in the light of Long COVID. The recent literature on the RAS in COVID-19, antihypertensiva, and Long COVID was briefly reviewed.; (3) Results: While the levels of the BK serum degradation products should return to normal concentrations during convalescence, this was not true for some patients. This could be due to persisting liver problems, because CPN is synthesized there, but also to a dysregulated RAS. This was not reflected in the levels of selected RAS/KKS serum proteins like angiotensinogen (AGT), although AGT correlated with disease severity in HoP. However, standard tests in routine patient care in Long COVID often come back normal, and it may be that BK degradation is specific in some pathophysiologies. Moreover, the HoP group was sub-divided based on the serum protein profiles and COVID-19 severity.; (4) Conclusions: We point out two insights: 1) Sensitive technology such as omics methods might provide unexpected significant differences within the pre-defined patient groups of a clinical study. Those can only be explored, if the cohorts are large enough and properly matched with respect to the parameters known beforehand (e.g., age, gender, co-morbidities). 2) Results of the BK-reporter serum protease activity assay could be indicative of persisting liver problems and/or potentially of Long COVID. Clinical studies are required to test this hypothesis.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Liver Failure , Chronobiology Disorders , Hypertension , COVID-19
7.
authorea preprints; 2022.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-AUTHOREA PREPRINTS | ID: ppzbmed-10.22541.au.166453983.32235498.v1

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection exposes patients with heart failure to a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. In LVAD patients, one of the key problems that can lead to life-threatening low-flow or pump malfunction due to thrombus development in the inflow cannula, device body, or outflow graft, implicating hemodynamic instability, hemolysis, renal or hepatic failure, or cerebral or peripheral thromboembolism. [Endothelial protein C receptor and thrombomodulin levels are elevated along with procoagulants such as factor VIII, P-selectin, and von Willebrand factor and downregulated along with thrombomodulin as a result of the cytokine storm released by endothelial and immune cells. In general ,](#ref-0013) LVAD thrombosis has been found to occur in 2–13% of adult patients who use current continuous-flow devices. However, LVAD thrombosis due to COVID-19 is underreported and a few cases presented. We present a case of accelerated LVAD outflow thrombosis in the setting of COVID-19 infection with multiorgan failure.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Thromboembolism , von Willebrand Diseases , Thrombosis , Liver Failure , COVID-19
8.
Hepatology ; 76(6): 1563-1575, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1858803

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cholestasis is associated with disease severity and worse outcome in COVID-19. Cases of secondary sclerosing cholangitis (SSC) after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection have been described. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 between 03/2020 and 07/2021 were included. Patients were stratified as having (i) no chronic liver disease (CLD), (ii) non-advanced CLD (non-ACLD), or (iii) advanced CLD (ACLD). Patients with CLD and non-COVID-19 pneumonia were matched to patients with CLD and COVID-19 as a control cohort. Liver chemistries before (Pre) and at first, second, and third blood withdrawal after SARS-CoV-2 infection (T1-T3) and at last available time point (last) were recorded. A total of 496 patients were included. In total, 13.1% (n = 65) had CLD (non-ACLD: 70.8%; ACLD: 29.2%); the predominant etiology was NAFLD/NASH (60.0%). COVID-19-related liver injury was more common among patients with CLD (24.6% vs. 10.6%; p = 0.001). After SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients with CLD exhibited progressive cholestasis with persistently increasing levels of alkaline phosphatase (Pre: 91.0 vs. T1: 121.0 vs. last: 175.0 U/L; p < 0.001) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (Pre: 95.0 vs. T1: 135.0 vs. last: 202.0 U/L; p = 0.001). A total of 23.1% of patients with CLD (n = 15/65) developed cholestatic liver failure (cholestasis plus bilirubin ≥6 mg/dl) during COVID-19, and 15.4% of patients (n = 10/65) developed SSC. SSC was significantly more frequent among patients with CLD and COVID-19 than in patients with CLD and non-COVID-19 pneumonia (p = 0.040). COVID-19-associated SSC occurred predominantly in patients with NAFLD/NASH and metabolic risk factors. A total of 26.3% (n = 5/19) of patients with ACLD experienced hepatic decompensation after SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSIONS: About 20% of patients with CLD develop progressive cholestasis after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with NAFLD/NASH and metabolic risk factors are at particular risk for developing cholestatic liver failure and/or SSC after COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cholangitis, Sclerosing , Cholestasis , Liver Failure , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease , Humans , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/complications , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/complications , Cholestasis/complications
10.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.10.04.21263507

ABSTRACT

Background With large-scale COVID-19 vaccination implemented world-wide, safety signals needing rapid evaluation will emerge. We report population-based, age- and-sex-specific background incidence rates of conditions representing potential vaccine adverse events of special interest (AESI) for the Swedish general population using register data. Methods We studied an age/sex-stratified random 10% sample of the Swedish population on 1 Jan 2020, followed for AESI outcomes during 1 year, as the COVID-19 pandemic emerged and developed, before the start of vaccinations. We selected and defined the following outcomes based on information from regulatory authorities, large-scale adverse events initiatives and previous studies: aseptic meningitis, febrile seizure, Kawasaki syndrome, MISC, post-infectious arthritis, arthritis, myocarditis, ARDS, myocardial infarction, stroke, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, kidney failure, liver failure, erythema multiforme, disseminated intravascular coagulation, autoimmune thyroiditis, and appendicitis. We calculated incidence rates stratified by age, sex and time period (quarters of 2020), and classified them using Council of International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) categories: very common, common, uncommon, rare, or very rare. Results We included 972,723 study subjects, representing the Swedish national population on 1 Jan 2020. We found that AESI incidence rates vary greatly by age and in some cases sex. Several common AESIs showed expected increase with age, while some (e.g. appendicitis, aseptic meningitis, autoimmune thyroiditis, Kawasaki syndrome and MISC) were more common in young people, and others exhibited a flatter age pattern (e.g. myocarditis, DIC and erythema multiforme). Consequently, the CIOMS classification for AESIs varied widely according to age. Considerable variability was suggested for some AESI rates across the 4 quarters of 2020, potentially related to pandemic waves, seasonal variation, healthcare system overload or other healthcare delivery effects. Conclusion Age, sex, and timing of rates are important to consider when background AESI rates are compared to corresponding rates observed with COVID-19 vaccines.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism , Arthritis, Infectious , Myocardial Infarction , Meningitis, Aseptic , Venous Thromboembolism , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome , Erythema Multiforme , Renal Insufficiency , Myocarditis , Seizures, Febrile , Liver Failure , Thyroiditis, Autoimmune , Arthritis , COVID-19 , Appendicitis , Stroke
11.
Semin Dial ; 34(6): 457-471, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1376444

ABSTRACT

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in sepsis does have a role in removing excessive fluid, and also role in removal of mediators although not proven today, and to allow fluid space in order to feed. In these conditions, continuous renal replacement therapy can improve morbidity but never mortality so far. Regarding sepsis, timing has become a more important issue after decades and is currently more discussed than dosing. Rationale of blood purification has evolved a lot in the last years regarding sepsis with the discovery of many types of sorbent allowing ideas from science fiction to become reality in 2021. Undoubtedly, COVID-19 has reactivated the interest of blood purification in sepsis but also in COVID-19. Burn is even more dependent about removal of excessive fluid as compared to sepsis. Regarding cardiac failure, ultrafiltration can improve the quality of life and morbidity when diuretics are becoming inefficient but can never improve mortality. Regarding brain injury, CRRTs have several advantages as compared to intermittent hemodialysis. In liver failure, there have been no randomized controlled trials to examine whether single-pass albumin dialysis offers advantages over standard supportive care, and there is always the cost of albumin.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Burns , COVID-19 , Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy , Heart Failure , Liver Failure , Sepsis , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Quality of Life , Renal Dialysis , SARS-CoV-2 , Sepsis/therapy
12.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.07.04.21259979

ABSTRACT

Background: The information on characteristics and causes of mortality in deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is scarce in the literature. This study aimed to document the clinical profile with causes of death in deceased patients admitted in a COVID-19 dedicated hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Methods: This cross-sectional retrospective study included 108 COVID-19 associated deceased patients admitted in Kurmitola general hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh between 25 March 2020 and 24 June 2020) Data were collected from hospital record. Causes of death were categorized into early and late with cut-off of 48 hours of hospitalization. Results: Among 809 hospitalized cases of COVID-19, 108 patient died (13.35%) over three months of study period. The mean age of the deceased patients was 60.2 (SD 13.94) years; 86.1% were male. About 85% had at least one comorbidity with diabetes mellitus (65.7%) was the most common one. The most common symptoms were breathlessness (88.0%), fever (65.7%) and cough (43.5%). Nearly 75% presented with severe disease. Patients had altered biochemical profiles and treated with different drugs including antibiotics and steroids. Young age and malnutrition were two characteristic features. Only one third got intensive care support. The most common cause of death was acute respiratory syndrome (95.37%). Septic shock & acute myocardial infarction were predominantly early and uremia, hepatic failure & hyperglycemic crisis were the predominant causes of late hospital death. Conclusions: The findings of this study will help clinicians as well as policy makers to take necessary steps to prevent death from COVID-19 in Bangladeshi population.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Shock, Septic , Fever , Diabetes Mellitus , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , Uremia , Malnutrition , Liver Failure , Death , COVID-19
13.
Dig Liver Dis ; 53(9): 1071-1072, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1284034
16.
World J Gastroenterol ; 27(17): 1905-1919, 2021 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1227081

ABSTRACT

Due to their immunomodulatory potential and release of trophic factors that promote healing, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are considered important players in tissue homeostasis and regeneration. MSCs have been widely used in clinical trials to treat multiple conditions associated with inflammation and tissue damage. Recent evidence suggests that most of the MSC therapeutic effects are derived from their secretome, including the extracellular vesicles, representing a promising approach in regenerative medicine application to treat organ failure as a result of inflammation/fibrosis. The recent outbreak of respiratory syndrome coronavirus, caused by the newly identified agent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has forced scientists worldwide to use all available instruments to fight the infection, including the inflammatory cascade caused by this pandemic disease. The use of MSCs is a valid approach to combat organ inflammation in different compartments. In addition to the lungs, which are considered the main inflammatory target for this virus, other organs are compromised by the infection. In particular, the liver is involved in the inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, which causes organ failure, leading to death in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. We herein summarize the current implications derived from the use of MSCs and their soluble derivatives in COVID-19 treatment, and emphasize the potential of MSC-based therapy in this clinical setting.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Liver Failure , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Cells ; 10(5)2021 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1223957

ABSTRACT

Liver injury in COVID-19 patients has progressively emerged, even in those without a history of liver disease, yet the mechanism of liver pathogenicity is still controversial. COVID-19 is frequently associated with increased serum ferritin levels, and hyperferritinemia was shown to correlate with illness severity. The liver is the major site for iron storage, and conditions of iron overload have been established to have a pathogenic role in development of liver diseases. We presented here six patients who developed severe COVID-19, with biochemical evidence of liver failure. Three cases were survived patients, who underwent liver biopsy; the other three were deceased patients, who were autopsied. None of the patients suffered underlying liver pathologies. Histopathological and ultrastructural analyses were performed. The most striking finding we demonstrated in all patients was iron accumulation into hepatocytes, associated with degenerative changes. Abundant ferritin particles were found enclosed in siderosomes, and large aggregates of hemosiderin were found, often in close contact with damaged mitochondria. Iron-caused oxidative stress may be responsible for mitochondria metabolic dysfunction. In agreement with this, association between mitochondria and lipid droplets was also found. Overall, our data suggest that hepatic iron overload could be the pathogenic trigger of liver injury associated to COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Iron Overload/etiology , Liver Failure/etiology , Liver/pathology , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , Antiviral Agents , Biopsy , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Ferritins/analysis , Hepatocytes/cytology , Hepatocytes/pathology , Humans , Iron/analysis , Iron/metabolism , Iron Overload/mortality , Iron Overload/pathology , Iron Overload/therapy , Liver/cytology , Liver/metabolism , Liver Failure/mortality , Liver Failure/pathology , Liver Failure/therapy , Liver Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Mitochondria/pathology , Positive-Pressure Respiration , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
18.
Transplant Proc ; 53(4): 1175-1179, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1199109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected all facets of life and continues to cripple nations. COVID-19 has taken the lives of more than 2.1 million people worldwide, with a global mortality rate of 2.2%. Current COVID-19 treatment options include supportive respiratory care, parenteral corticosteroids, and remdesivir. Although COVID-19 is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with comorbidities, the vulnerability, clinical course, optimal management, and prognosis of COVID-19 infection in patients with organ transplants has not been well described in the literature. The treatment of COVID-19 differs based on the organ(s) transplanted. Preliminary data suggested that liver transplant patients with COVID-19 did not have higher mortality rates than untransplanted COVID-19 patients. Table 1 depicts a compiled list of current published data on COVID-19 liver transplant patients. Most of these studies included both recent and old liver transplant patients. No distinction was made for early liver transplant patients who contract COVID-19 within their posttransplant hospitalization course. This potential differentiation needs to be further explored. Here, we report 2 patients who underwent liver transplantation who acquired COVID-19 during their posttransplant recovery period in the hospital. CASE DESCRIPTIONS: Two patients who underwent liver transplant and contracted COVID-19 in the early posttransplant period and were treated with hydroxychloroquine, methylprednisolone, tocilizumab, and convalescent plasma. This article includes a description of their hospital course, including treatment and recovery. CONCLUSION: The management of post-liver transplant patients with COVID-19 infection is complicated. Strict exposure precaution practice after organ transplantation is highly recommended. Widespread vaccination will help with prevention, but there will continue to be patients who contract COVID-19. Therefore, continued research into appropriate treatments is still relevant and critical. A temporary dose reduction of immunosuppression and continued administration of low-dose methylprednisolone, remdesivir, monoclonal antibodies, and convalescent plasma might be helpful in the management and recovery of severe COVID-19 pneumonia in post-liver transplant patients. Future studies and experiences from posttransplant patients are warranted to better delineate the clinical features and optimal management of COVID-19 infection in liver transplant recipients.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Liver Transplantation , Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine Monophosphate/therapeutic use , Aged , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Alanine/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Immunization, Passive , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Liver Failure/complications , Liver Failure/therapy , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , COVID-19 Serotherapy
19.
medrxiv; 2021.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2021.04.13.21252871

ABSTRACT

Background and Aims: COVID-19 patients may have asymptomatic hyperlipasemia without abdominal imaging findings or abdominal pain. In addition, primary and secondary pancreatitis have been described in COVID-19 patients. There is limited information on how the groups compare in outcomes. The aim is to compare outcomes among these groups. Methods: This is a retrospective study from 12 hospitals within one healthcare system examining outcomes between hospitalized COVID-19 patients with a lipase <3x upper limit of normal (ULN), asymptomatic hyperlipasemia (>3x ULN), secondary pancreatitis (typical respiratory COVID-19 symptoms and found to have pancreatitis), and primary pancreatitis (presenting with pancreatitis). Results: Of 11,883 patients admitted with COVID-19, 1,560 patients were included: 1,155 COVID-19 patients with a normal serum lipase (control group), 270 with an elevated lipase <3x ULN, 46 patients with asymptomatic hyperlipasemia with a lipase 3xULN, 57 patients with secondary pancreatitis, and 32 patients with primary pancreatitis. On adjusted multivariate analysis, the elevated lipase <3x ULN and asymptomatic hyperlipasemia groups had worse outcomes. The mortality was OR1.6 (95% CI 1.2-2.2) and 1.1 (95% CI 0.5-2.3), respectively. The need for mechanical ventilation was OR 2.8 (95% CI 1.2-2.1) and 2.8 (95% CI 1.5-5.2), respectively. Longer length of stay was OR 1.5 (95%CI 1.1-2.0) and 3.16 (95%CI 1.5-6.5), respectively. Conclusion: COVID-19 patients with an elevated lipase< 3x ULN and asymptomatic hyperlipasemia have generally worse outcomes than those with pancreatitis. This could be attributed to extrapancreatic causes (liver failure, renal failure, enteritis, etc), which may signify a more severe course of clinical disease. Key words: pancreas; SARS-CoV-2; pancreatitis


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain , Asymptomatic Diseases , Renal Insufficiency , Liver Failure , Pancreatitis , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Enteritis , COVID-19
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL